Keyboard export to YEM

[jwyvern]

The biggest issues I have with YEM is that it is so slow when ticking / unticking / building packs, and seems a bit buggy.

You can drag the mouse with left click down the columns of extra voices and they are automatically ticked with no delay.

If you have voices already in the keyboard that you want included there should be no need to tick those when they show in YEM because the act of clicking on Genos at top left should cause them to be ticked (when using Wifi transfer) .
John

[valimaties]

Eileen and Bill!
I don't think you understand the reason of this feature in Keyboard!
Second one, I don't think you understand the protection that Yamaha did and that it is uncrackable even if a pack is on a USB! What to think, that a CPF if is on USB is unprotected?!  LOL 

To come back to what I said: A need for this function in keyboard is for those who lost their backups, who lost USB or the PC! For some reasons, I think you know that SSDs are in some cases defective (or simple HDDs) and you could lost your things. What happening in that case?! Why not having such a function!

Really, I don't understand your resistance on implementing new functions  Looks like you are the engineers and I put you to work on! LOL 

[Bill]

Eileen and Bill!
I don't think you understand the reason of this feature in Keyboard!
Second one, I don't think you understand the protection that Yamaha did and that it is uncrackable even if a pack is on a USB! What to think, that a CPF if is on USB is unprotected?!  LOL 

To come back to what I said: A need for this function in keyboard is for those who lost their backups, who lost USB or the PC! For some reasons, I think you know that SSDs are in some cases defective (or simple HDDs) and you could lost your things. What happening in that case?! Why not having such a function!

Really, I don't understand your resistance on implementing new functions  Looks like you are the engineers and I put you to work on! LOL 

Hi Vali

1.  I do understand why YOU may want such a feature, it is just that I would have no need for it, and I think it would simply complicate matters for a lot of people.

2.  I do not have any resistance to your suggestion whatsoever.

3.  I do not understand what you mean by the comment "Looks like you are the engineers and I put you to work on!"

4. In addition to my comments above I fully understand how the Yamaha Security feature works, so I do not have any concerns about the possibility of your feature compromising it.

Just for info - I have a lot more important stuff on my PC's than the many Expansion Packs that I have. As a result I take great care that I have several backups of all my data.
Every file that I have on my MAC is automatically mirrored to a second SSD drive. In addition to this the MAC performs a regular System Backup.  In addition to this all files that are a non personal nature are saved to a Cloud service. 

Surely everyone should understand how important backups are, they should not be complaining too Yamaha afterwards.

If they were to attempt to implement the changes to the keyboard OS and the YEM, this would surely divert attention away from developing the next major update. I know what I would prefer.

Regards

Bill

Regards

Bill

[valimaties]

Bill, thanks for your answer! 

Now, I've 40 We are the generation of "speedy" things We want things happening quickly!
What I've  spoke about four years ago of an touch screen Yamaha's keyboard, it happened with Genos. Most of features come to Yamaha are from youngest people (Live Control, touch screen, chord looper, etc). Now, in 2.0, is about "a need" (Style Section Reset) which I think I have made a disaster in Yamaha's emails about this one A lot of emails, a lot of explanations, and I have proves I don't know if my emails have reached Japan engineers, but I think I'm the one which I put a brick to the born of this feature 
In the ending, in a future, we will see an exporting process, from keyboard to PC THAT's what I think That's what THE BEST for user!

Best regards,
Vali

[EileenL]

What is best for the user is to make back ups which most of us do on a regular basis. I see no advantage in your suggestion to alter things that most of us do not have any problems with.

[valimaties]

What is best for the user is to make back ups which most of us do on a regular basis. I see no advantage in your suggestion to alter things that most of us do not have any problems with.

It's an old vision on how things work

[Misu]

Hello my friend Vali,

Why you want things, during the years Yamaha give us always the ultimate arrangers, just to play his music.
I look to my SX 900 and I don't understand:
Why touch screen the old buttons was very good
Why all characters to write; <Nokia style> was perfect
Why Pitch joystick; 4 weeks 2 from each side looks better
Why tempo reset; my vocal singers never make mistakes.
Why new functions on YEM; it is an amazing piece of software to install new superior packs.
Why more memory; you already have the best sound possible on board.
Why everything; when you have Style Magic, Mix Master, Style Un-locker, Cubase and entire work of the Yamaha players community.

So a big YES from me and don't forget the time is precious, if you can, make your Genos perfect buying an simple add-on named 4x.
It is a waste of energy, money are everything, only the competitors and sales will change something.
All the best to everyone!
Mihai

[DerekA]

We always need new features to keep moving forward, otherwise we'd never have the astonishing products that we have today.

I have no problem hearing people's ideas about what could be changed or improved. It only becomes an issue if someone keeps droning on about their pet idea at every opportunity, or ridicules people who disagree with them. (Vali please note I am NOT accusing you of anything, it's just a general point).

I've seen lots of good ideas on this forum, some of which have been implemented. I expect the good ideas with broad appeal are noticed by Yamaha's R&D people.

[Tyros5Mad]

What is best for the user is to make back ups which most of us do on a regular basis. I see no advantage in your suggestion to alter things that most of us do not have any problems with.

Now this is something you and I completely agree on Eileen. Thanks for saying it.

@Vali
I think some philosopher back in the past said that "For each idea that gets taken up by the majority, there were ten that did not". Keep doing what you are doing my friend.

Regards,
Richard